Mosa87’s neo-archaeology

Mosa87’s neo-archaeology

Tommaso Berra · 4 weeks ago · Art

Still through March 11 it will be possible to discover the work of artist Mosa87 presented in Spectrum‘s new Milan store. On the occasion of the exhibition Collater.al asked the artist what he means by “neo-archaeology” and about the seemingly difficult relationship between graffiti art and street art, and the tendency of the latter to have become more and more an art gallery phenomenon by tying itself less and less to the streets.

1. Your research is closely related to the underground and urban scene. How did you approach this world?
I started graffiti at the age of 13, 14. I was therefore fascinated very early on by environments such as the subway, abandoned places, as well as places abandoned by large cities. For me urban culture is the dominant culture, present in our everyday lives and therefore inspires me on a daily basis. The tag is by definition underground because it’s made by strangers who don’t care about making money in opposition to the street art that we see everywhere today.

2. What was your first approach to art? Did you start right away with spray
cans on city walls as a writer and street artist?

My first approach was by mimetism. I wanted to copy what I saw in the street. Gradually I understood the rules of the game and started painting Mosa’s name on the walls.

3. The street holds the sign of our passage on Earth. The very structure of cities reflects our culture, our habits and our progress. With the spray can you leave your personal mark, the wall becomes your canvas, what do you intend to communicate with this style?
Above all, painting with a spray can is linked to my personal pleasure. The line, the body, the movement are the main interests of my practice. I am a tagger. What interests me is movement mainly, which is why I wanted to develop a choreographic system around the practice of tag. For a very long time my interest has been to shock and to always go further in the ways of putting my name in style, therefore quality and quantity. In every city in the world. Now what interests me are the political tags of a social nature that stand out from the aesthetic quality but have a deep message. This is a new opening on my work.

4. We know you are an eclectic artist. In addition to works on walls, you also make sculptures, paintings and videos. How do you choose different types of mediums?
We live in a time when it is easy to find the medium that suits us. By this I mean that technologies help us to free our creation. So I use the medium in line with my ideas, with my concepts. There are so many ways to transcribe our sensitivity that I don’t want to imprison it in a box. For example, if I want to talk about vacant lots I can do it in a sound way. I will use a microphone that will record the sound of stones and footsteps as well as birds in the sky. There is therefore no limit to creation with the mediums that I use. I think it is important for artists from the culture of the tag specifically to be able to free themselves from the codes and thus offer the public and more especially those of contemporary art a larger, open and sensitive vision of the urban world. Being a tagger is a philosophy, walking the streets stealing your bombs, getting by in a hostile environment. It is a very complete way of life and therefore it must transcribe when one enters the field of contemporary art all its facets of this environment little known in truth. Street artists would have us believe that doing street art is fun and cool. In truth it’s the opposite, wandering the streets at night, crossing abandoned spaces, meeting drug addicts, prostitutes drinking alcohol to keep warm. The way of life this way of making art is dark. I want my art to reflect this reality. To do this, I use all the mediums at my disposal to transcribe this way of life, this energy. This is what I embody. That’s what I want to give to the public, with my vision of a 35-year-old adult living in 2023.

5. How do you feel about the increasing phenomenon of street art moving
into more institutional venues such as galleries?

For me, street art is a basket in which we put artists who make graffiti, pochoir, muralists… It’s a patchwork of different urban activities. Very often used by institutions. It’s a mainstream movement. Because of my practice as a tagger, I find myself in opposition to this movement. Although there are many common points, such as painting with the same material and using one’s body to paint on large walls, for example. For my part, I tried to avoid getting into this movement as much as possible. What I miss in street art is the conceptual thinking, the questioning of the graffiti movement and too often the lack of aesthetic proposal when moving from the street to the gallery. In my opinion, far too many street artist and graffiti artists think that their past as graffiti writers is enough to legitimize their status as gallery artists. You have to do a real work, renew yourself while keeping your ethics. As a tagger, the challenge lies there for me. Once this shift has been made, it is then a question of expressing oneself and keeping one’s coherence and urban energy. 

6. What do you mean by Neo Archaeology? The title of your series, now also landed in Milan at SPECTRUM.
Neo-archeologia is a series of sculptures. The idea is to find fragments of objects in abandoned places that I cross while going to tag. These objects are then brought back to the workshop and transformed, to give them a new life. This form of contemporary archeology thus allows me to create a work of science fiction around its objects and thus to be able to create scenarios which come to feed my artistic work. History, archaeology, science fiction are the central themes of this Neo-archéologia series. Here in Milan I present version 3.0. Neo-archéologia wants to be a cycle of work, a method, a way of making visible and alive the abandoned places mainly due to the gentrification of our cities. So it’s a way for me to talk about tag, heritage and ultimately the relationship to our spaces in our big cities as well as our relationship to objects and our consumption. It’s a work process that allows me to walk the streets of different cities and give them back their uniqueness. My way of working allows me to adapt to each geography. It is also a way for me to discover the culture, the legacies of our past, of our civilizations.

7. Can you reveal something about your next project? Which city would you like to “mark” with your
works and why?

My next big project is a solo show in Paris. I would like to travel to South America. From what I see, from what I know, on this continent has a very strong culture and identity It is a region of the world that I would like to meet. I hope one day very soon.

Mosa87 | Collater.al
Mosa87’s neo-archaeology
Art
Mosa87’s neo-archaeology
Mosa87’s neo-archaeology
1 · 13
2 · 13
3 · 13
4 · 13
5 · 13
6 · 13
7 · 13
8 · 13
9 · 13
10 · 13
11 · 13
12 · 13
13 · 13
Brice Gelot, “For the love of god”

Brice Gelot, “For the love of god”

Tommaso Berra · 2 days ago · Photography

For the love of God is an expression that expresses an image of religion understood as a solution to salvation, often associated with a sense of dissatisfaction or impatience. It is in common use, embedded in language as much as religion itself is pervasive, for multiple and complex reasons, in society.
“For the love of god” is also the title of the photographic series by French artist Brice Gelot, which Collater.al is publishing in full preview. The gaze is toward religion – the Christian Catholic religion in particular – understood as a social-cultural system of behavior, which exceeds rational explanations by tending toward transcendence. It is perhaps in this never running out of meaning in the real world that the success of religious art over the centuries lies, called upon to interpret and depict symbols that are always the same but take on new meanings from time to time.

Photographing faith becomes for Brice Gelot an expression of the reality. Observing how people face the challenges of nature and photographing them means living a life of faith firsthand, which becomes a tool for understanding and analyzing what is sacred and profane.
In Gelot’s shots, it emerges how religion is part of the human experience and how it represents a force that can shape the world around us and its aesthetic representation. Tattoos, statues, icons, niches for the veneration of saints, the artistic imagery in these photographs is not metaphysical but real, living along the streets and on people’s skin.

Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot | Collater.al
Brice Gelot, “For the love of god”
Photography
Brice Gelot, “For the love of god”
Brice Gelot, “For the love of god”
1 · 14
2 · 14
3 · 14
4 · 14
5 · 14
6 · 14
7 · 14
8 · 14
9 · 14
10 · 14
11 · 14
12 · 14
13 · 14
14 · 14
The inner landscapes of Tetyana Maryshko

The inner landscapes of Tetyana Maryshko

Giorgia Massari · 3 days ago · Photography

The haze of uncertainty, which came with the advent of the pandemic and the subsequent Ukrainian war, swept over photographer Tetyana Maryshko, so much so that it led her to create a long-lasting photographic project in which she relentlessly searches for her own essence. Through a path made of honesty to herself, the Ukrainian photographer explores her inner self by making self-shots in which she blends personal and relational elements. “There is me, the camera and the truth,” says the artist.
Each photograph captures a reflection, a conversation, a still moment in time that dialogues with her soul. The shots, in black and white and color, attempt to go beyond the aesthetics of the subject by applying a veil of blurring that prevents the image from being clearly read, or by inserting textured surfaces in front of the lens, such as wet glass or bubble wrap. At other times, however, the photograph is clear and sharp, such as her shot in the bathtub, which hints at suffering. The gaze is lost in emptiness, the flushed eyes exude weeping and despair while the tight lips communicate helplessness, that feeling that every human being feels in the face of war.

An element that recurs often in Tetyana Maryshko’s is the flower, placed in dialogue with the body: placed along the spine or in front of the eyes, to cover the gaze, symbolizing a desire for rebirth. Tetyana tells how it was a long, difficult and troubled journey: “When we turn the camera toward ourselves, we embark on a journey of self-discovery that requires introspection and vulnerability… In the end, this project was not just a personal journey, but a universal one. A testimony to the human experience.”

The inner landscapes of Tetyana Maryshko
Photography
The inner landscapes of Tetyana Maryshko
The inner landscapes of Tetyana Maryshko
1 · 9
2 · 9
3 · 9
4 · 9
5 · 9
6 · 9
7 · 9
8 · 9
9 · 9
The male body taxonomy by Francesco Paolo Gassi

The male body taxonomy by Francesco Paolo Gassi

Laura Tota · 4 days ago · Photography

Inhabiting a body means perceiving it, recognizing oneself in it and being recognized. It means feeling familiar to oneself and to others, relating to the World through nerve endings, fat and senses.
The body is the core center of our own identity and will, and the nude has long been a favorite subject for photographers since the birth of the photographic medium. However, speaking of male nude, its diffusion is lower, except for some particular cases, since it has been considered less interesting (if not disturbing) by the dominant “Male Gaze” (or the representation of the female universe, in the visual arts and literature, from a male and heterosexual point of view, which represents women as mere sexual objects aimed at the satisfaction of the male audience). Only since the late ’70s, thanks to the birth of the homosexual liberation movement and the advertising market, we have witnessed a new life of nude male, able to transform the male body into an erotic subject open to hedonistic contemplation.

 
 
 
 
 
Visualizza questo post su Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Un post condiviso da GASSI (@iam_gassi)

An example is the iconic body of works by Robert Mapplethorpe, attracted by the male nude since childhood, which recalls classical nudity and gives dignity and beauty to a considered degrading category of people, or the most recent portraits by the photographer Florian Hetz who, through tight close ups, immortalizes the true essence and innate sensuality of the male body.

And it is precisely on the border between art and eroticism that the narration of “Bodies” is played out, the latest project by Francesco Paolo Gassi, a young author from Puglia who investigates the physicality of the body in his practice. Francesco is literally obsessed with imperfections and the naturalness of smudging, far from the glossy aesthetic clichés: hair, skin and body fluids are his playing field, details are his favorite points of view. He moves carefully around the male body, that is at the same time, something familiar to him, but also a source of shame for a community he has had to hide his sexuality for years.

Art, pornography and taxonomy dialogue in the photographic space. The poses, meticulously studied, just as the illumination and the relationship of the body with space, suggest and allude to an eroticization of the body that is never explicit, they orient the human anatomy to emphasize the insignificant and the banal, elevating it to the object of desire. It’s an almost scientific approach that, through the photographic image, aims to make eternal the organic matter of which man is made and to reach the essence of every portrayed subject.
Thus, the male bodies become the ideal playing field on which to renegotiate identity, free from social superstructures and free from conditioning, presented to the eye of the observer in its total, disturbing and ambivalent authenticity. The project combines digital photographs with snapshots:  the unrepeatable body is perpetuated in the uniqueness of a Polaroid, as well as the quality of the digital image reflects every single detail of the epidermal specificity of each photographed body.

The male body taxonomy by Francesco Paolo Gassi
Photography
The male body taxonomy by Francesco Paolo Gassi
The male body taxonomy by Francesco Paolo Gassi
1 · 7
2 · 7
3 · 7
4 · 7
5 · 7
6 · 7
7 · 7
Lise Johansson and the non-appartenence to places

Lise Johansson and the non-appartenence to places

Giorgia Massari · 5 days ago · Photography

Why do we feel we belong to some places and not others? Danish photographer Lise Johansson (1985) questions herself. This reflection is the starting point of her research, based on an analysis of the relationship between humans and the environment they inhabit. Very often our homes represent who we are, they are a reflection of our soul and character. Minimal or baroque, total white or colorful, full of objects or aseptic; in any case, we build environments tailored to us, in which we feel comfortable and which shape our person. But when we go outside the home and find ourselves relating to other environments, such as the workplace, a doctor’s office or our friend’s house, external factors come into play that we cannot control and with which we are forced to interface. Lise Johansson reasons about these unconscious dynamics that govern unconscious psychology.

In the series I’m not here, the photographer makes a series of selfies inside an abandoned hospital. The environment is aseptic and a disturbing desolation in which the white dominates relentlessly. The daylight enters through the windows, sometimes in contrast with the artificial one, accentuating the chromatic power of white, highlighted even more by the milky complexion of the photographer and her long candid dress, typical of hospital patients.
The relationship between the subject and the environment is not relaxed. One perceives a melancholy tension, typical of subjects locked inside a place. The figure almost seems to wander like a spectrum, its face is never visible because of the photographic framing and, in other cases, it is hidden inside or behind an object – like a sink or a mirror. This detail allows the woman to be present in space but at the same time not to inhabit it, as if her mind tried to escape in other directions, looking for a way out. Like the subject, the environment is vulnerable, stationary in limbo and undergoing transformation. The place exists, like the woman, but they are forgotten entities, without status and completely emptied of a soul.

Lise Johansson and the non-appartenence to places
Photography
Lise Johansson and the non-appartenence to places
Lise Johansson and the non-appartenence to places
1 · 9
2 · 9
3 · 9
4 · 9
5 · 9
6 · 9
7 · 9
8 · 9
9 · 9